// EXPERIMENTAL · PAPER TRADING ONLY · NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE //
Skip to content

Daily briefing

Go Remote‑Viewing: Monday, October 12, 2026

Corporate players—SRI, Swann, Price—and the discipline of blind, locked testing.

> **Daily Briefing – No verified breaking items** > > The monitored feed yielded no new breaking news. The remote‑viewing community still thrives on disciplined experimentation. > > ## What happened in the lore > In the early 1970s, **Ingo Swann** and **Pat Price** emerged as prominent TSR researchers. Their work at **SRI International** drew on the 1974 *Nature* paper on information transfer under sensory shielding [1], which introduced protocols of blind tasking and locked data streams that would later become staple in remote‑viewing methodology. These early experiments, while exciting, were subject to later critique over control and cue handling—highlighted when the CIA’s 1995 Autonomous Investigation Rapport (AIR) report dissected outcomes and methodological concerns [2]. > > ## What the evidence actually says > - The *Nature* study reported above‑chance descriptive matches but is now cited as a methodological **reference point**, not definitive proof [1]. > - The AIR evaluation distinguished lab‑based statistical findings from operational intelligence use, concluding that without independent replication and rigorous blind designs, the evidence remained unreliable for intelligence purposes [2]. > - The declassified CIA archive (2002) continues to serve as a primary‑source repository, offering tasking documents and evaluation memos that show the program’s trajectory and its eventual cessation as an operational capability [3]. > > ## How to play today's cases > 1. **Sign up** for the play‑through or drop‑in session at the community hub. > 2. **Lock your submission** before the deadline—once locked, the data cannot be altered. > 3. **Blind tasking**: view a target with no prior or contextual clues. > 4. **Independent judging**: each entry is evaluated by at least two contrasting reviewers; disputes are resolved through a peer‑review panel. > 5. **Feedback integrity**: judged scores are published separately from the raw data, preserving scorer anonymity. > 6. **Track streaks & leaderboards** to see who’s consistently hitting that above‑chance mark. > > ## Sources to open > [1] ACADEMIC – Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding (Nature, 1974) > [2] ARCHIVE – An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications (AIR, 1995) > [3] ARCHIVE – CIA CREST Star Gate Collection (declassified, 2002) > [4] ARCHIVE – Ask Molly: Did CIA Really Study Psychic Powers? (CIA Stories, 2021) > [5] ARCHIVE – Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process (1983) > [6] ACADEMIC – Out-of-Body Experiences and Their Neural Basis (The Neuroscientist, 2005)