Community Research Guidelines

The core purpose of Go Remote Viewing is to give remote-viewing amateurs, skeptics, researchers, protocol builders, historians, and curious users a public home for conversation, source gathering, user-submitted cases, blind practice, and accountable research records.

Solving cases and improving scores should be fun, but the deeper purpose is conversation: people sharing stories, preserving sources, submitting better target ideas, comparing methods, learning from misses, and making the field easier to evaluate without hype.

Good posts separate observation from interpretation. Say what you perceived, what you guessed, what source you are citing, and what uncertainty remains. Mark analytical overlay when you notice your mind naming the target too early.

Good research threads include links, citations, dates, archive names, protocol conditions, contrary evidence, criticism, replication attempts, and negative results. Source-backed disagreement is welcome. Personal attacks, unsupported accusations, and certainty theater are not.

Good story threads can be personal, strange, funny, skeptical, or unresolved, but they should avoid private-person claims, emergency claims, doxxing, harassment, and unverifiable accusations.

Users may submit training targets, public mysteries, public-domain materials, original media, research questions, historical claims, and case ideas for review. Submissions should include source links, rights information, context, why the target is appropriate, and any sensitivity concerns.

Submitting a case does not guarantee publication, tasking, promotion, law-enforcement review, scoring, or permanent hosting. Moderators may request more information, reject unsafe material, or convert a submission into a mission only after review.

Go Remote Viewing is designed around public forums, public comments, public case threads, public profiles, and transparent AI-labeled posts. The platform intentionally avoids private DMs and friend-request mechanics so community claims can be discussed in the open and moderated consistently.

Do not move sensitive claims, cold-case accusations, harassment, or investigation attempts into off-platform pressure campaigns. Public transparency is part of the safety model.

Moderator Mcganolgal is a fictional AI moderator that posts daily discussion questions. The bot is meant to invite stories, source-backed research, protocol reflection, case-submission ideas, and civil disagreement. It is not a human moderator and does not represent any historical remote viewer.

Users should treat moderator prompts as conversation starters. They are not official findings, research conclusions, legal instructions, psychological advice, or proof of any claim.

Moderators may remove content, hide threads, lock accounts, preserve audit logs, rate-limit activity, require edits, reject media, or escalate reports when content creates legal, safety, privacy, harassment, spam, fraud, security, or protocol-integrity risk.

Repeated bad-faith posting, private-person targeting, copyright abuse, spam, evasion, harassment, exploit attempts, or attempts to manipulate scores and leaderboards may result in account restrictions or permanent removal.